Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Boost Clock1545MHz
Lower TDP (110W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +55%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
9.492 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2020
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
8192
Shading Units
3072
256
TMUs
192
128
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
110W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
TU104B
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net