Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
8184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+70138%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2009
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
8192
Shading Units
8
256
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
23W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
G98
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
