CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+78%
14.75 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
RTX A2000 Embedded
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
2560
256
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GA107S
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
406 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Board Design
500W
TDP
60W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
2
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon 780M
3
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M
4
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
5
NVIDIA GRID K520 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
6
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
7
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
Related News
1
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
2
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
3
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
4
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
5
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
6
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
7
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
8
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
9
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
10
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy