Intel Arctic Sound M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

VS

Intel Arctic Sound M Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)

4096 additional rendering cores

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages

Released 7 months late

Boost Clock2050MHz

Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Intel Arctic Sound M

14.75 TFLOPS

Data Center GPU Flex 170 +13%

16.79 TFLOPS

Intel Arctic Sound M

VS

Data Center GPU Flex 170

Graphics Card

Jan 2022

Release Date

Aug 2022

Xe Graphics

Generation

Data Center GPU

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1950 MHz

-

Boost Clock

2050 MHz

1200 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

16GB

HBM2e

Memory Type

GDDR6

4096bit

Memory Bus

256bit

1229GB/s

Bandwidth

512.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

8192

Shading Units

4096

256

TMUs

256

128

ROPs

128

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

32

-

L1 Cache

-

8 MB

L2 Cache

16 MB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

262.4 GPixel/s

230.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

524.8 GTexel/s

29.49 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

33.59 TFLOPS

14.75 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

16.79 TFLOPS

3.686 TFLOPS

FP64 (double)

-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512

GPU Name

DG2-512

-

GPU Variant

ACM-G10

Generation 12.7

Architecture

Generation 12.7

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

6 nm

Process Size

6 nm

21.7 billion

Transistors

21.7 billion

406 mm²

Die Size

406 mm²

Board Design

500W

TDP

150W

900 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

No outputs

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0

8-pin EPS

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

-

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

2

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M

3

Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon 780M

4

NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB vs Intel Arctic Sound M

5

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M

6

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

7

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI

8

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile

9

Intel Arctic Sound M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

10

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

Related News

1

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

2

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

3

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

4

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

5

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

6

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

7

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

8

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

9

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

10

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower