Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
7808 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1493MHz
Lower TDP (18W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +1185%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro P520 Mobile
1.147 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2019
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1303 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
8192
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.89 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.83 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
17.92 GFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1147 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.83 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
18W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GP108
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy