Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 135M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 9.504GB/s)
8176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +56630%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 135M
0.026 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2007
Xe Graphics
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
594 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
9.504GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
G86-621-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
10W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy