CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
7744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+1334%
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
Tesla C2075
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
448
256
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
247W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon 780M
2
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
4
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M
5
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
6
NVIDIA GRID K520 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
7
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI100
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060
Related News
1
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
2
Only 3 Weeks Left! AMD Zen5 Launching Soon
3
Ilya Departs OpenAI to Launch New Company Aiming at Superintelligence!
4
Comprehensive Overview of AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen5 Desktop CPUs
5
Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher
6
It's 2024: This Company Released a Laptop Supporting DOS and Windows 95
7
AMD's Strix Halo Supports Up to 128GB Memory, Clearly Designed for AI Large Language Models
8
AMD to Launch Advanced Ryzen AI PRO Series Soon
9
Intel Delays Lunar Lake Shipment: Postponed from June to September
10
Initial Test Results of AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Revealed: IPC Improvement Meets Expectations
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy