CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 FHHL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 829.4GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL 's Advantages
Boost Clock1290MHz
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+11%
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 FHHL
13.21 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
Tesla V100 FHHL
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2018
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
937 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1290 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
5120
256
TMUs
320
128
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.1 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
412.8 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.42 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.21 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.605 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GV100
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
250W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
2
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon 780M
3
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M
4
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
5
NVIDIA GRID K520 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
6
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
7
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
Related News
1
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
2
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
3
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
4
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
5
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
6
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
7
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
8
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
9
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
10
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy