Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs AMD FirePro M6000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 43W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
+147%
2.534 TFLOPS
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Jul 2012
HD Graphics-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
43W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Heathrow
-
GPU Variant
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.5 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
