Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA L4 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA L4 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM L4 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA L4 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (300.1GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
7376 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 72W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
L4 +23750%
30.29 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
L4
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2008
Tesla Ada(Lxx)
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

795 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
300.1GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
60
SM Count
6
7424
Shading Units
48
240
TMUs
24
80
ROPs
16
240
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

163.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
30.29 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
30.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
473.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

72W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
G94
AD104-???-A1
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy