Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5725 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps

ATI Mobility FireGL V5725 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5725 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1575MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility FireGL V5725
0.163 TFLOPS
GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps +1631%
2.822 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Aug 2020
Mobility FireGL
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1575 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
120
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.720 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.40 GPixel/s
5.440 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
88.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.645 TFLOPS
163.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.822 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
88.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
31W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M86
GPU Name
TU117
M86-ME XT GL (216-0683010)
GPU Variant
N18S-G5
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.378 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
135 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy