Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 60W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 25.44GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition +170%
0.52 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2009
Manhattan
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
795 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.44GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
400
Shading Units
64
20
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

15W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Madison
GPU Name
G94
Madison XT (216-0772003)
GPU Variant
N10E-GS1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy