Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (125W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +111%
10.65 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX
5.027 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2021
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
4096
Shading Units
1408
256
TMUs
88
256
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net