Home GPU Comparison MTT S50 vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

MTT S50 vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM MTT S50 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

MTT S50 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
1664 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
MTT S50 +768%
5.2 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2023
Release Date
May 2015
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
384
TMUs
24
ROPs
8
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.72 GTexel/s
TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.2 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
599.0 GFLOPS
GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
50W
W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

SuDi
GPU Name
Oland
GPU Variant
-
MUSA
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.95 billion
Unknown
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
CUDA
-
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy