Home GPU Comparison MTT S80 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

MTT S80 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM MTT S80 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

MTT S80 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 255W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
MTT S80 +675%
14.4 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2023
Release Date
May 2011
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1800 MHz
Base Clock
-
0 MHz
Boost Clock
-
MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
SM Count
-
4096
Shading Units
1280
TMUs
80
ROPs
32
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

255W
TDP
150W
350 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x SDI
CPU 8Pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

ChunXiao
GPU Name
Cayman
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
MUSA
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
Unknown
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

11
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
-
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy