Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs AMD FirePro W7170M

NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs AMD FirePro W7170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 100W)
AMD FirePro W7170M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro W7170M +7492%
2.961 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Oct 2015
NVS Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.140 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.14 GPixel/s
4.280 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.54 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.961 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.961 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
185.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

11W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
5 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy