Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs AMD Radeon R9 M385X

NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs AMD Radeon R9 M385X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M385X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M385X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1100MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M385X +4953%
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
May 2015
NVS Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
14
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.140 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
4.280 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

11W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Strato
-
GPU Variant
Strato XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy