Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 185W)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX +19394%
7.603 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Feb 2021
NVS
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
36
16
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
185W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
TU106
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy