Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs ATI FireGL V3600

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs ATI FireGL V3600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (18W vs 73W)
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
104 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600 +269%
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jun 2007
NVS
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
3
16
Shading Units
120
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
RV630
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

18W
TDP
73W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy