Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FirePro S9000

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FirePro S9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro S9000 +8171%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Aug 2012
NVS
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
16
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Tahiti
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

18W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy