Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 285W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
8432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 +112976%
44.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jun 2024
NVS
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2340 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
66
16
Shading Units
8448
8
TMUs
264
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
66
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
285W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
AD102
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
AD102-175-KEF-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy