CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA NVS 300 vs ATI FireGL V8650
NVIDIA NVS 300 vs ATI FireGL V8650
VS
NVIDIA NVS 300
ATI FireGL V8650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
+1028%
0.44 TFLOPS
NVS 300
VS
FireGL V8650
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Aug 2007
NVS
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
16
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
R600
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Board Design
18W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI Radeon X1600 vs NVIDIA NVS 300
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 vs NVIDIA NVS 300
3
NVIDIA NVS 300 vs ATI Radeon HD 3870 AGP
4
AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs NVIDIA NVS 300
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA NVS 300
6
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs NVIDIA NVS 300
7
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs NVIDIA NVS 300
8
NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
9
NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
10
NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
Related News
1
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
2
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
3
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
4
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
5
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
6
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
7
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
8
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
9
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
10
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy