Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs ATI FireGL V8650

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650 +1028%
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Aug 2007
NVS
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
16
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
R600
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

18W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy