Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 425W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1008GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
14576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 D +188464%
73.54 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Dec 2023
NVS
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2280 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
1008GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
114
16
Shading Units
14592
8
TMUs
456
4
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
456
-
RT Cores
114
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1149 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
73.54 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.54 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1149 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
425W
200 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
AD102
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
AD102-250-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy