Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290 +12333%
4.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Nov 2013
NVS
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Hawaii
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy