Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD FireStream 9250

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250 +900%
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2008
NVS
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
48
Shading Units
800
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
RV770
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy