Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (736.3GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
10192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +52120%
52.22 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2024
NVS
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2295 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1438 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
736.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
80
48
Shading Units
10240
8
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
285.6 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
816.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.22 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.22 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
816.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
320W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
AD103
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
AD103-400-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy