Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon RX 590 GME

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon RX 590 GME

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 GME to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1420MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 590 GME +6443%
6.543 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2020
NVS
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1257 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1420 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
45.44 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
204.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.543 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.543 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
409.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Polaris 20
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
Polaris 20 XTR (215-0910066)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy