Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 315 vs ATI FireGL V8650

NVIDIA NVS 315 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650 +340%
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Aug 2007
NVS
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
48
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
R600
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

19W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy