Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
152 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510 +628%
0.306 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Jun 2007
NVS
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
40
16
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
RV610
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy