Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +1012%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Nov 2012
NVS
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Tahiti
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy