CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
NVIDIA NVS 510
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
+75%
0.536 TFLOPS
NVS 510
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Graphics Card
Oct 2012
Release Date
Sep 2008
NVS
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
216
16
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GT200
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Board Design
35W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD FirePro W4100
2
NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM
3
NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
4
NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM
5
NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon RX 560DX
6
NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon RX 550 512SP
7
NVIDIA NVS 510 vs ATI FirePro V7800
8
NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
9
NVIDIA NVS 510 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
10
NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD FirePro W7000
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy