Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 +75%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Sep 2008
NVS
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
216
16
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT200
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy