Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6900 XT +7429%
23.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Oct 2020
NVS
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
288.0 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
720.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.08 TFLOPS
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1440 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Navi 21
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XTX (215-121000167)
Kepler
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy