Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs AMD FirePro M3900

NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 25W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2010
NVS Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
160
16
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

25W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF117
GPU Name
Seymour
N13M-NS1
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy