Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 810 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

NVIDIA NVS 810 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 810 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (1410MHz vs 1033MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 810
1.058 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +1093%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Sep 2021
NVS
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

902 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1033 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
70
512
Shading Units
4480
32
TMUs
280
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.53 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
33.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
1058 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
33.06 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy