Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P104 101 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

NVIDIA P104 101 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM P104 101 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P104 101 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 77% (1683MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.3GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P104 101 +153%
8.617 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Nov 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1683 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
256.3GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1792
160
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

107.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
269.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
134.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.617 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
269.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
Tahiti
GP104-101-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy