Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3544 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +24471%
10.32 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2007
Tesla
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
3072bit
Memory Bus
64bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
40
224
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

165W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
RV610
-
GPU Variant
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy