Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs ATI FirePro V3900

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3104 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +1553%
10.32 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2012
Tesla
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
480
224
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
8
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

165W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy