Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (2040MHz vs 1440MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +229%
10.32 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1512 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
3072bit
Memory Bus
32bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
24 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

165W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy