Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA T400

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA T400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1440MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +843%
10.32 TFLOPS
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
May 2021
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
3072bit
Memory Bus
64bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
6
3584
Shading Units
384
224
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
24 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy