Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA A2

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA A2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 200.1GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (1770MHz vs 1440MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242 +127%
10.32 TFLOPS
A2
4.531 TFLOPS
VS
A2

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2021
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1440 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
10
3584
Shading Units
1280
224
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
24 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
7 nm
Process Size
8 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
826 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
8.6
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy