Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD FirePro W5100

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD FirePro W5100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W5100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W5100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242 +622%
10.32 TFLOPS
FirePro W5100
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2014
Tesla
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Bonaire
-
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy