Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 220 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
3536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (58W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242 +10539%
10.32 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 220 OEM
0.097 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2009
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
6
3584
Shading Units
48
224
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.048 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.096 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
97.15 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

165W
TDP
58W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.2
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy