Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 640 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242 +1389%
10.32 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640
0.693 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
384
224
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
24 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.216 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.86 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
692.7 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.86 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-300-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
8.0
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy