Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs Intel H3C XG310

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1550MHz vs 1440MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242 +333%
10.32 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2020
Tesla
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
24
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
DG1
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
7 nm
Process Size
10 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
826 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy