Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 24 GB +1325%
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Mar 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
988 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
285.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GM200
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GM200-880-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
8 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy