Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 135M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 9.504GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 62W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000 +1746%
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 135M
0.026 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
594 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
9.504GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
2
192
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

62W
TDP
10W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
G86
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
G86-621-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy