Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +732%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

62W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
DG2-128
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy