Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
7440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +3099%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
7680
40
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
8 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy