Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 154W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M +87%
0.432 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600 SDI
0.23 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
625 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
12
240
Shading Units
96
40
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
154W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
G80
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy