Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
208 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M +440%
0.432 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
625 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
4
240
Shading Units
32
40
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
G84
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy